Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Influenza immunisation - attitudes and beliefs of UK health care workers
  1. Julia Smedley (jcs{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk)
  1. MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, United Kingdom
    1. Jason Poole (jp2{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk)
    1. MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, United Kingdom
      1. Eugene Waclawski (eugene.waclawski{at}renver-pct.scot.nhs.uk)
      1. ANHOPS Research Committee, United Kingdom
        1. Anthony Stevens (anthony.stevens{at}royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk)
        1. ANHOPS Resarch Committee, United Kingdom
          1. John Harrison (john.harrison{at}newcastle.ac.uk)
          1. ANHOPS Research Committee, United Kingdom
            1. John M Watson (john.watson{at}hpa.org.uk)
            1. Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, United Kingdom
              1. Andrew Hayward (andrew.hayward{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk)
              1. UCL Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, United Kingdom
                1. David Coggon (dnc{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk)
                1. MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, United Kingdom

                  Abstract

                  Aims: To explore attitudes to influenza immunisation and rates of uptake among staff working in acute hospitals in the UK. Method: Among 6302 responders (54% of those mailed), 19% had taken up influenza immunisation during winter 2002/3. Vaccination was well tolerated, with a low prevalence of side effects (13%) and associated time off work (2%). The majority of subjects who accepted vaccination (66%) were most strongly influenced by the personal benefits of protection against influenza. Prevention of sickness absence and protection of patients were the prime motivation for only 10% and 7% of subjects respectively. Among 3967 who declined vaccination, the most common primary de-motivators were concern about safety (31%) and efficacy (28%). Twenty two per cent were most strongly deterred by lack of time to attend for vaccination. Free text answers indicated that 37% were resistant to uptake because of a perceived low ratio of personal benefit to adverse effects. Subjects said they would be persuaded to take up vaccination in future by easier access (36%), more information about personal benefit/risk (34%), and more information about effects on staff absence (24%). Conclusions: These findings indicate that the uptake of influenza immunisation among UK health care workers remains low. There is some scope for increasing uptake by improving accessibility and encouragement from professional peers. However, our results suggest that perception of small personal benefit in relation to risk mitigates importantly against higher uptake of routine annual influenza vaccination by health care workers. Thus, resource might better be allocated to ensuring efficient targeted immunisation in epidemic years. Although the prevention of infection in patients and sickness absence in staff were not strong motivators for health care workers in this study, this might change if more supporting evidence became available.

                  • attitudes
                  • health personnel
                  • influenza vaccines

                  Statistics from Altmetric.com

                  Request permissions

                  If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.