Article Text

O16-4 An integrated approach to infection and respiratory illness prevention in home healthcare: preliminary results of the safe home care cleaning and disinfecting study
  1. Margaret Quinn1,
  2. Pia Markkanen1,
  3. Catherine Galligan1,
  4. Susan Sama1,
  5. Rebecca Gore1,
  6. Nancy Goodyear2,
  7. Natalie Brouillette1,
  8. David Kriebel1,
  9. John Lindberg1,
  10. Alexis Parker Vega1,
  11. Noor Sheikh1,
  12. Nicole Karlsson1
  1. 1University of Massachusetts Lowell, Department of Work Environment, Lowell, USA
  2. 2University of Massachusetts Lowell, Department of Clinical Laboratory and Nutritional Sciences, Lowell, USA


Objectives While cleaning and disinfecting (C&D) are essential for infection prevention (IP) in healthcare, there is increasing evidence that C&D chemicals cause occupational respiratory illness. An international working group (WG) on C&D in healthcare was engaged by the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health to identify research needs to develop an integrated framework for effective IP and occupational health (OH) protection for healthcare workers (Quinn, WG Co-Chair). This presentation describes the WG and a study of C&D among home care (HC) aides which was guided by WG recommendations. Study objectives were to: 1) identify the extent to which C&D is performed by HC aides, 2) assess C&D respiratory hazards, and 3) compare the effectiveness of conventional versus “green” C&D products to reduce pathogens in the home environment.

Methods HC aides completed a survey including questions about C&D product use and respiratory hazards occurring during their HC visits. In an environmental laboratory, airborne exposures from C&D products were assessed during simulated cleaning tasks. In a microbiology laboratory, cleaning effectiveness (removal of soil) and disinfection effectiveness (reduction in microorganisms) on common household surface materials were compared using bleach, a “green” product, and a do-it-yourself (DIY) mixture.

Results The survey population included 1,249 HC aides contributing information on 3,484 HC visits. Aides performed C&D in 80% of their visits. Bleach was used in 25% of visits; an additional 15% used other irritant chemicals. Environmental assessment of C&D products showed volatile organic compounds emitted from all products; peak exposures to chlorine could exceed occupational exposure limits. Microbiology assessment found that bleach and a “green” product effectively removed soil and reduced E. coli and S. aureus; the DIY mixture was less effective.

Conclusions An integrated IP-OH approach to assessing C&D exposures, as recommended by the WG, can provide more comprehensive prevention strategies.

Statistics from

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.