Article Text

PDF
O01-6 Changes in organisational injustice and subsequent changes in insomnia symptoms: using observational data as non-randomised pseudo-trials
  1. Tea Lallukka1,2,
  2. Jaana Halonen1,
  3. Borge Sivertsen3,4,5,
  4. Jaana Pentti1,
  5. Sari Stenholm6,
  6. Marianna Virtanen1,
  7. Paula Salo1,7,
  8. Jussi Vahtera6,8,
  9. Mika Kivimäki1,9
  1. 1Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2University of Helsinki, Department of Public Health, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway
  4. 4The Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway
  5. 5Department of Psychiatry, Helse Fonna HF, Haugesund, Norway
  6. 6Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  7. 7Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  8. 8Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  9. 9Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background Organisational injustice may affect sleep quality, but previous empirical studies have not examined whether improvement in the psychosocial risk factors is associated with a beneficial change in sleep.

Aim We examined the onset and removal of the exposure to organisational injustice (relational and procedural) in relation to subsequent changes in insomnia symptoms.

Methods Participants were 24,287 Finnish public sector employees with data from three consecutive surveys between 2000 and 2012, contributing to a total of 36,189 observations. We applied a “pseudo-trial design” to determine temporality between deterioration in relational and procedural justice over the first two surveys, and onset of insomnia symptoms in the third survey. Similarly, we examined, if the improvement in the psychosocial exposures was associated with subsequent remission of insomnia symptoms. This design allowed us to examine whether removal of relational and procedural injustice was associated with better sleep in the third survey. Several social and health-related covariates were controlled for in generalised estimating equation based models, allowing to account for within person correlation.

Results Onset of relational injustice was associated with subsequent insomnia symptoms (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02–1.30), whereas no association was found for procedural injustice (OR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.95–1.22), after adjustments for sociodemographic factors, health behaviours, comorbid conditions, shift work and apnoea. Removal of relational injustice was associated with better sleep after full adjustments (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96). Removal of procedural injustice did not improve sleep (OR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.77–1.06).

Conclusions These results suggest that relational injustice can worsen sleep quality, while removal of relational injustice appears to improve sleep.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.