Article Text

PDF

0317  Quantifying Hazardous Occupational Exposures and Injuries in Home Care: Results from the Safe Home Care Survey0317  Quantifying Hazardous Occupational Exposures and Injuries in Home Care: Results from the Safe Home Care Survey
  1. Margaret Quinn1,
  2. Pia Markkanen1,
  3. Catherine Galligan1,
  4. Susan Sama1,
  5. David Kriebel1,
  6. Rebecca Gore1,
  7. Laura Punnett1,
  8. Letitia Davis2,
  9. Angela Laramie2,
  10. Natalie Brouillette1,
  11. Daniel Okyere1,
  12. Chuan Sun1
  1. 1University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
  2. 2Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Objectives In countries with ageing populations, home care (HC) aides are among the fastest growing jobs. There are few quantitative studies of HC occupational safety and health (OSH) hazards. The objectives of this study were to quantify a range of OSH exposures and injuries among HC aides and to evaluate the variability across job categories.

Method HC aides were recruited for a survey via agencies that employ aides and schedule their visits with clients and through a labour union of aides employed directly by clients/families. The innovative questionnaire design included detailed questions about the most recent home visits, as well as about the individual aides’ OSH experiences.

Results The final population included 1249 HC aides (634 agency-employed, 615 client-employed) contributing information on 3484 HC visits. Among aides, in the past 12 months, 2% had a needlestick or other sharps injury; 7% reported physical aggression and 19% verbal aggression; 11% had a job-related injury resulting in lost work time or need for medical care; 33% reported back pain: of these, 59% experienced pain once a week or more and 68% took medication for it. Among visits, in the past month, 62% involved patient handling while only 25% involved a patient handling device; 80% involved cleaning, 10% indoor cigarette smoke. Agency-employed versus client-employed aides differed by amount of client handling, use of sharps, and characteristics of clients.

Conclusions Aides experience substantial OSH exposures and injuries. Quantification of hazards is useful to prioritise resources for the development of preventive interventions and to provide a foundation for etiologic research.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.