rss
Occup Environ Med 67:639-648 doi:10.1136/oem.2009.050070
  • Review

Return-to-work interventions integrated into cancer care: a systematic review

Table 3

The effect of the interventions on return to work of the seven studies reporting return to work

Author(s) Study design Assignment to control group Measurement instrument Follow-up Return-to-work rate at follow-up* OR (95% CI) Quality score (range from 0 to 24)
Intervention group, N (%) Control group, N (%)
Capone et al28 Controlled trial Availability before primary treatment Semi-structured interview 12 months post-treatment/completion intervention 14 (70%) 5 (36%) 0.24 (0.06 to 1.02) 16
Maguire et al38 Controlled trial Date of treatment Semi-structured interview 12–18 months post-treatment 32 (76%) 25 (54%) 0.37 (0.15 to 0.93) 18
Leitsmann et al37 Prospective cohort study NA Hospital report 5 years after start of intervention 135 (37%) NA NA 9
Berglund et al25 Controlled trial The refusal of the intervention but agreement to be monitored Questionnaire 12 months after completion of intervention 24 (80%) 28 (93%) 3.50 (0.65 to 18.98) 16
Berglund et al26 Controlled trial Randomisation Questionnaire 12 months after completion of intervention 80 (89%) 76 (83%) 0.63 (0.27 to 1.50) 18
Fismen et al32 Prospective cohort study NA Questionnaire 5 years after completion of intervention 19 (56%) NA NA 10
Nieuwenhuijsen et al41 Prospective cohort study NA Semi-structured interview 12 months after completion of intervention 23 (89%) NA NA 13
  • * The number of patients differs from table 1 due the fact that not all patients were employed before the start of the study or due to missing values.

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.