Article Text

PDF
The effects of timing on the cost-effectiveness of interventions for workers on sick leave due to low back pain
  1. Miranda van Duijn1,
  2. Marinus J Eijkemans1,
  3. Bart W Koes2,
  4. Marc A Koopmanschap3,
  5. Kim A Burton4,
  6. Alex Burdorf1
  1. 1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  2. 2Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  3. 3Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  4. 4Spinal Research Unit, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Alex Burdorf, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, CA 3000, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; a.burdorf{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

Objective To examine the effects of different timing of structured interventions for workers on sick leave due to low back pain on return to work (RTW), and the consequences for costs and benefits.

Methods Literature reviews were conducted to identify RTW curves and to estimate treatment effects, costs and benefits of structured interventions among workers on sick leave due to low back pain. RTW curves were mathematically described by Weibull functions and intervention effects, expressed by hazard ratios, were used to adjust these Weibull functions. Subsequently, these functions were used to evaluate the theoretical effects of interventions on reduction in number of days on sick leave and on the benefit–cost ratio.

Results The cost-benefits of a RTW intervention among workers on sick leave due to low back pain were determined by the estimated effectiveness of the intervention, the costs of the intervention, the natural course of RTW in the target population, the timing of the enrolment of subjects into the intervention, and the duration of the intervention.

Conclusion With a good RTW in the first weeks, the only early interventions likely to be cost-beneficial are inexpensive work-focused enhancements to early routine care, such as accommodating workplaces. Structured interventions are unlikely to have an additional impact on the already good prognosis when offered before the optimal time window at approximately 8 to 12 weeks. The generalisibility of the effectiveness of a RTW intervention depends on the comparability of baseline characteristics and RTW curves in target and source populations.

  • Return to work
  • intervention
  • cost-effectiveness
  • low back pain
  • occupational health practice
  • musculoskeletal
  • sickness absence

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Alex Burdorf is the guarantor of the paper. He accepts full responsibility for the work, the conduct of the study, has access to all data, and controls the submission process and decision to publish.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.