rss
Occup Environ Med 2009;66:395-401 doi:10.1136/oem.2008.042168
  • Original article

Physical workload, low back pain and neck–shoulder pain: a Swedish twin study

  1. T Nyman1,2,
  2. M Mulder2,
  3. A Iliadou3,
  4. M Svartengren1,
  5. C Wiktorin1
  1. 1
    Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2
    Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3
    Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Teresia Nyman, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Norrbacka, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden; teresia.nyman{at}ki.se
  • Accepted 1 November 2008
  • Published Online First 5 December 2008

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate if high physical workload is associated with low back pain (LBP) and/or neck–shoulder pain (NSP) when taking into account the influence of genetic and shared environmental factors. Further, the study aims to explore the potential influence of genetic and shared environmental factors in the associations between high physical workload and the three disorder subgroups: solely LBP, solely NSP, and concurrent LBP and NSP.

Methods: Data on 16 107 monozygotic and dizygotic twins, born during 1959–1985, were obtained from a cross-sectional study, performed in 2005–2006 by the Swedish Twin Registry. Odds ratios (ORs) calculated in cohort analyses and co-twin control analyses were used to assess the associations between high physical workload and LBP and NSP when controlling for genetic and shared environmental factors.

Results: In the cohort analysis, the association between high physical workload and the group with any one symptom (LBP and/or NSP) was OR 1.47 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.57). The co-twin control analyses indicated that the association was not confounded by genetic and shared environmental factors with OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.75) for dizygotic twins and OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.95) for monozygotic twins.

In the cohort analyses the association with high physical workload was higher for concurrent LBP and NSP (OR 1.80 (95% CI 1.62 to 1.99)) than for solely LBP (OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.57)) and solely NSP (OR 1.31 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.43)). Concurrent LBP and NSP was the only group that showed a stepwise decrease of the point estimates between the cohort analysis and the co-twin control analyses, OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.00 to 2.94) for dizygotic twins, and OR 1.29 (95% CI 0.64 to 2.59) for monozygotic twins indicating confounding by genetic and shared environmental factors.

Conclusions: High physical workload was associated with LBP and/or NSP even after adjusting for genetic or shared environmental factors. Only for concurrent LBP and NSP, genetic and shared environmental factors seemed to have an influence on the association with high physical workload.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Ethics approval: The study was approved by the regional ethical vetting board in Stockholm (DNr 2006/870–31/1).

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. oem.2008.042168v1
    2. 66/6/395 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest occupational, public, community health jobs

Latest occupational, public, community health jobs

Show me all >>