rss
Occup Environ Med 66:353-360 doi:10.1136/oem.2008.042481
  • Review

Determinants of implementation of primary preventive interventions on patient handling in healthcare: a systematic review

Table 4 Studies with barriers and facilitators in the implementation of multiple interventions aimed at patient handling in health care
Study Design (duration) Population (setting) Intervention Outcomes Type of barrier (B) or facilitator (F)
Charney et al (2006)31 OBS (1–4 years, average 2 years) 31 hospitals (hospital) Zero-lift program: (1) replace manual lifting with mechanical lifting; (2) written policy and procedures supporting mechanisation of lifting; (3) training; (4) zero-lift committee; and (5) patient screening procedure to determine ambulatory level of new patients Significant reduction in time-lost injuries and frequency of injuries Initial investment not easily allocated in some hospitals (B-2B) Initiated with less equipment and later augmented when funds were available (B-2B) High staff turnover rates (B-2B) Mandatory use of equipment (F-2D) No standardised assessment of patient ambulatory status (B-2D) Each hospital put their individual stamp on the zero-lift model (B-2D)
Knibbe and Friele (1999)32 CT (1 year) 139 subjects INT and 239 subjects CON (home care) (1) Patient hoists (40); (2) training; (3) introduction of 12 specially trained lifting coordinators; (4) no intervention Significant reduction in back pain prevalence and in total number of transfers Relatives able to care for patients with use of hoist without presence of nurse (F-2B)
Nelson et al (2006)33 OBS (9 months) 23 high risk units in 7 facilities (home care and hospital) 6 program elements: (1) ergonomic assessment protocol; (2) patient handling assessment criteria and decision algorithms; (3) peer leader role, “back injury resource nurses”; (4) state-of-the-art equipment; (5) after action reviews; and (6) no lift policy Significant reduction in injury rates and modified duty days Patient handling equipment well accepted by staff (F-1A) No viable technology solutions for high-risk, high-volume patient handling tasks, eg repositioning patient in bed or chair (B-2B) Patients less likely to embrace new patient handling technologies and practices at the onset of the program (B-2G)
  • CON, control group; CT, controlled trial; INT, intervention group; OBS, observational study; RCT, randomised controlled trial. Type of barrier: B-2B represents a barrier (B), within environment (2), category B (convenience and easy accessibility).

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.