rss
Occup Environ Med 2009;66:353-360 doi:10.1136/oem.2008.042481
  • Review

Determinants of implementation of primary preventive interventions on patient handling in healthcare: a systematic review

  1. E Koppelaar1,2,
  2. J J Knibbe3,
  3. H S Miedema2,4,
  4. A Burdorf1
  1. 1
    Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Netherlands Expert Center for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    LOCOmotion, Bennekom, The Netherlands
  4. 4
    Expert Center Participation, Work and Health, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands
  1. A Burdorf, Erasmus MC, Department of Public Health, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; a.burdorf{at}erasmusmc.nl
  • Accepted 5 December 2008
  • Published Online First 18 February 2009

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims (1) to identify barriers and facilitators during implementation of primary preventive interventions on patient handling in healthcare, and (2) to assess their influence on the effectiveness of these interventions.

Methods: PubMed and Web of Science were searched from January 1988 to July 2007. Study inclusion criteria included evaluation of a primary preventive intervention on patient handling, quantitative assessment of the effect of the intervention on physical load or musculoskeletal disorders or sick leave, and information on barriers or facilitators in the implementation of the intervention. 19 studies were included, comprising engineering (n = 10), personal (n = 6) and multiple interventions (n = 3). Barriers and facilitators were classified into individual and environmental categories of factors that hampered or enhanced the appropriate implementation of the intervention.

Results: 16 individual and 45 environmental barriers and facilitators were identified. The most important environmental categories were “convenience and easy accessibility” (56%), “supportive management climate” (18%) and “patient-related factors” (11%). An important individual category was motivation (63%). None of the studies quantified their impact on effectiveness nor on compliance and adherence to the intervention.

Conclusion: Various factors may influence the appropriate implementation of primary preventive interventions, but their impact on the effectiveness of the interventions was not evaluated. Since barriers in implementation are often acknowledged as the cause of the ineffectiveness of patient handling devices, there is a clear need to quantify the influence of these barriers on the effectiveness of primary preventive interventions in healthcare.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw - grant number 63200014).

  • Competing interests: None.

Responses to this article

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. oem.2008.042481v1
    2. 66/6/353 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.