A panel study of air pollution in subjects with heart failure: negative results in treated patients
- 1Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
- 2Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
- 3Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- 4Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 5Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, UK
- Justin Barclay, Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZP, UK; j.barclay{at}abdn.ac.uk
- Accepted 25 September 2008
- Published Online First 18 November 2008
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate preclinical adverse effects of ambient particulate air pollution and nitrogen oxides in patients with heart failure.
Methods: A cohort of 132 non-smoking patients living in Aberdeen, Scotland, with stable chronic heart failure were enrolled in a repeated-measures panel study. Patients with atrial fibrillation or pacemakers were excluded. Participants were studied for 3 days every 2 months for up to 1 year with monitoring of pollutant exposure and concurrent measurements of pathophysiological responses. Measurements included daily area concentration of particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter of <10 micrometres (PM10), particle number concentration (PNC) and nitrogen oxides; daily estimated personal concentration of particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter of <2.5 micrometres (PM2.5) and PNC exposures; and 3-day cumulative personal nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Concurrent meteorological data were recorded. Blood was taken at the end of each 3-day block for assays of markers of endothelial activation, inflammation and coagulation. Cardiac rhythm was monitored by ambulatory Holter monitor during the final 24 h of each block.
Results: The average 24 h background ambient PM10 ranged from 7.4 to 68 μg.m−3 and PNC from 454 to 11 283 particles.cm−3. No associations were demonstrated between the incidence of arrhythmias, heart rate variability or haematological/biochemical measures and any variations in pollutant exposures at any lags.
Conclusion: Assuming that low-level pollution affects the parameters measured, these findings may suggest a beneficial effect of modern cardioprotective therapy, which may modify responses to external risk factors. Widespread use of such drugs in susceptible populations may in future reduce the adverse effects of air pollution on the heart.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None.
-
Funding: This study was supported by a grant (0020010) from the UK Department of Health Policy Research Programme.
-
Ethics approval: The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.
-
Patient consent: Obtained.









