Article Text

PDF
Performance of self-reported occupational exposure compared to a job-exposure matrix approach in asthma and chronic rhinitis
  1. P J Quinlan1,
  2. G Earnest1,
  3. M D Eisner1,
  4. E H Yelin1,2,
  5. P P Katz1,2,
  6. J R Balmes1,
  7. P D Blanc1,3
  1. 1
    Department of Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  2. 2
    Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  3. 3
    Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Patricia Quinlan, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Building 30, 5th Floor, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA; pquinlan{at}medsfgh.ucsf.edu

Abstract

Objectives: Self-reported exposure to vapours, gas, dust or fumes (VGDF) has been widely used as an occupational exposure metric in epidemiological studies of chronic lung diseases. Our objective was to characterise the performance of VGDF for repeatability, systematic misclassification, and sensitivity and specificity against exposure likelihood by a job-exposure matrix (JEM).

Methods: We analysed data from two interviews, 24 months apart, of adults with asthma and chronic rhinitis. Using distinct job as the unit of analysis, we tested a single response item (exposure to VGDF) against assignment using a JEM. We further analysed VGDF and the JEM among a subset of 199 subjects who reported the same job at both interviews, using logistic regression analysis to test factors associated with VGDF inconsistency and discordance with the JEM.

Results: VGDF was reported for 193 (44%) of 436 distinct jobs held by the 348 subjects studied; moderate to high exposure likelihood by JEM was assigned to 120 jobs (28%). The sensitivity and specificity of VGDF against JEM were 71% and 66%, respectively. Among 199 subjects with the same job at both interviews, 32% had a discordant VGDF status (κ = 0.35). Those with chronic rhinitis without concomitant asthma compared to asthma alone were more likely to have a VGDF report discordant with the JEM (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 9.0; p = 0.01). Rhinitis was also associated with reported VGDF in a job classified by the JEM as low exposure (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.4; p = 0.003).

Conclusion: The VGDF item is moderately sensitive measured against JEM as a benchmark. The measure is a useful assessment method for epidemiological studies of occupational exposure risk.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was supported by NIH-NIEHS grant R01 ES 10906.

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.