rss
Occup Environ Med 2008;65:613-619 doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035584
  • Original article

An epidemiological study of the role of chrysotile asbestos fibre dimensions in determining respiratory disease risk in exposed workers

  1. L Stayner1,
  2. E Kuempel2,
  3. S Gilbert2,
  4. M Hein2,
  5. J Dement3
  1. 1
    Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  2. 2
    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  3. 3
    Division of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Department of Community & Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  1. Dr Leslie Stayner, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics MC923, University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, 1603 W Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612-4394, USA; lstayner{at}uic.edu
  • Accepted 14 December 2007
  • Published Online First 20 December 2007

Abstract

Background: Evidence from toxicological studies indicates that the risk of respiratory diseases varies with asbestos fibre length and width. However, there is a total lack of epidemiological evidence concerning this question.

Methods: Data were obtained from a cohort mortality study of 3072 workers from an asbestos textile plant which was recently updated for vital status through 2001. A previously developed job exposure matrix based on phase contrast microscopy (PCM) was modified to provide fibre size-specific exposure estimates using data from a re-analysis of samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Cox proportional hazards models were fit using alternative exposure metrics for single and multiple combinations of fibre length and diameter.

Results: TEM-based cumulative exposure estimates were found to provide stronger predictions of asbestosis and lung cancer mortality than PCM-based estimates. Cumulative exposures based on individual fibre size-specific categories were all found to be highly statistically significant predictors of lung cancer and asbestosis. Both lung cancer and asbestosis were most strongly associated with exposure to thin fibres (<0.25 μm). Longer (>10 μm) fibres were found to be the strongest predictors of lung cancer, but an inconsistent pattern with fibre length was observed for asbestosis. Cumulative exposures were highly correlated across all fibre size categories in this cohort (0.28–0.99, p values <0.001), which complicates the interpretation of the study findings.

Conclusions: Asbestos fibre dimension appears to be an important determinant of respiratory disease risk. Current PCM-based methods may underestimate asbestos exposures to the thinnest fibres, which were the strongest predictor of lung cancer or asbestosis mortality in this study. Additional studies are needed of other asbestos cohorts to further elucidate the role of fibre dimension and type.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All Versions of this Article:
    1. oem.2007.035584v1
    2. 65/9/613 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.