rss
Occup Environ Med 65:236-241 doi:10.1136/oem.2007.032706
  • Original article

The effectiveness of two occupational health intervention programmes in reducing sickness absence among employees at risk. Two randomised controlled trials

Table 3 Baseline characteristics and sickness absence in the intervention and control (usual care) groups in RCT 1 (occupational health intervention for the high risk group) and RCT 2 (telephone advice for the intermediate risk group)
Group allocation
Intermediate risk (IR) High risk (HR)
Control (IR-CG) Intervention (IR-IG) Control (HR-CG) Intervention (HR-IG)
Baseline
n 269 268 209 209
Mean age (years) 42.9 42.8 46.8 46.7
Sex (female; %) 12 13 6 6
Blue-collar (%) 57 58 80 77
Sickness absence
    None (% within group) 60 55 43 34
    Mean (days) 4.6 5.9 17.9 19.7
    Standard deviation 9.5 11.5 36.3 37.0
    Median (days) 0 1 4 6
    Upper quartile (days) 5 6 18 20
    Maximum (days) 72 70 229 221
    Sum (days) 1246 1581 3736 4115
Employment terminated during follow-up (%) 5.6 6.3 8.1 8.1
1 year follow-up
n 254 251 192 192
Sickness absence
    None (% within group) 46 45 23 31
    Mean (days) 6.9 7.0 29.9 19.3
    Standard deviation 14.3 12.4 53.3 44.0
    Median (days) 1 2 9 5
    Upper quartile (days) 7 7 32 15
    Maximum (days) 115 73 286 365
    Sum (days) 1755 1751 5744 3702

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.