rss
Occup Environ Med 2008;65:148 doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035360
  • Letter
    • PostScript

Authors’ response

  1. Helen C Francis,
  2. R McL Niven
  1. North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
  1. Dr Helen Francis, North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; helen.c.francis{at}manchester.ac.uk

    We thank Dr Preece for his comments. We believe that he is justified in questioning the make-up of the panel and that this has a significant bias for tertiary assessment of occupational lung disease. However, our aim in performing this process was to get this group of experts to agree on “definitions” with a view to unifying the label at this later clinical stage of the process.1 In addition, we hoped that the requirements of a specialist occupational lung disease assessment service would form a basis for developing a “standards of care” document for …

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.