rss
Occup Environ Med 2008;65:843-848 doi:10.1136/oem.2007.034652
  • Original article

Mortality and cancer incidence of Australian participants in the British nuclear tests in Australia

  1. R T Gun,
  2. J Parsons,
  3. P Crouch,
  4. P Ryan,
  5. J E Hiller
  1. Discipline of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
  1. Dr R T Gun, Discipline of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; richard.gun{at}adelaide.edu.au
  • Accepted 14 June 2008
  • Published Online First 19 September 2008

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the mortality and cancer incidence of Australian nuclear test participants, and to identify any association with exposure to ionising radiation.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the mortality and cancer incidence rates of participants (n = 10 983) were compared with rates in the general male Australian population. Dose reconstructions were carried out by a panel of health physicists. Mortality and cancer rates were compared with the general population and between groups of subjects categorised by assessed radiation exposure.

Results: All-cause mortality was not raised. Mortality and incidence were significantly raised for cancers of the head and neck, lung, colon and rectum, and prostate, and for all cancers combined. For oesophageal cancer, melanoma, all leukaemias and non-chronic lymphatic leukaemia (non-CLL leukaemia), incidence was significantly raised, but mortality was non-significantly raised. No association was found between radiation exposure and overall cancer incidence or mortality, or with any cancer or cancer deaths occurring in excess.

Conclusions: There is no evidence that the excess cancers and cancer deaths were caused by radiation exposure at the test sites. Possible contributing factors are high smoking prevalence and demographic differences from the Australian population with whom rates were compared. Asbestos is a likely contributor to some cancers in naval personnel.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest occupational, public, community health jobs

Latest occupational, public, community health jobs