rss
Occup Environ Med 64:361-365 doi:10.1136/oem.2006.028902
  • Original article

Defining and investigating occupational asthma: a consensus approach

  1. H C Francis1,
  2. C O Prys-Picard1,
  3. D Fishwick2,
  4. C Stenton3,
  5. P S Burge4,
  6. L M Bradshaw2,
  7. J G Ayres5,
  8. S M Campbell6,
  9. R McL Niven1
  1. 1North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Centre for Workplace Health, Health & Safety Laboratory, Buxton & University of Sheffield, UK
  3. 3Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  4. 4Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  5. 5Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen, UK
  6. 6National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr H Francis
 North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; Helen.C.Francis{at}manchester.ac.uk
  • Accepted 27 October 2006
  • Published Online First 27 November 2006

Abstract

Background: At present there is no internationally agreed definition of occupational asthma and there is a lack of guidance regarding the resources that should be readily available to physicians running specialist occupational asthma services.

Aims: To agree a working definition of occupational asthma and to develop a framework of resources necessary to run a specialist occupational asthma clinic.

Method: A modified RAND appropriateness method was used to gain a consensus of opinion from an expert panel of clinicians running specialist occupational asthma clinics in the UK.

Results: Consensus was reached over 10 terms defining occupational asthma including: occupational asthma is defined as asthma induced by exposure in the working environment to airborne dusts vapours or fumes, with or without pre-existing asthma; occupational asthma encompasses the terms “sensitiser-induced asthma” and “acute irritant-induced asthma” (reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS)); acute irritant-induced asthma is a type of occupational asthma where there is no latency and no immunological sensitisation and should only be used when a single high exposure has occurred; and the term “work-related asthma” can be used to include occupational asthma, acute irritant-induced asthma (RADS) and aggravation of pre-existing asthma. Disagreement arose on whether low dose irritant-induced asthma existed, but the panel agreed that if it did exist they would include it in the definition of “work-related asthma”. The panel agreed on a set of 18 resources which should be available to a specialist occupational asthma service. These included pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and FVC (% predicted); peak flow monitoring (and plotting of results, OASYS II analysis); non-specific provocation challenge in the laboratory and specific IgE to a wide variety of occupational agents.

Conclusion: It is hoped that the outcome of this process will improve uniformity of definition and investigation of occupational asthma across the UK.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 23 November 2007

  • Funding: None.

  • Competing interests: None.

Responses to this article