rss
Occup Environ Med 2007;64:291-303 doi:10.1136/oem.2005.025593
  • Review

Interventions for the prevention and management of neck/upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review

  1. M G Boocock,
  2. P J McNair,
  3. P J Larmer,
  4. B Armstrong,
  5. J Collier,
  6. M Simmonds,
  7. N Garrett
  1. Physical Rehabilitation Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr M G Boocock
 Physical Rehabilitation Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1020, New Zealand;mark.boocock{at}aut.ac.nz
  • Accepted 17 August 2006
  • Published Online First 14 September 2006

Abstract

Considered from medical, social or economic perspectives, the cost of musculoskeletal injuries experienced in the workplace is substantial, and there is a need to identify the most efficacious interventions for their effective prevention, management and rehabilitation. Previous reviews have highlighted the limited number of studies that focus on upper extremity intervention programmes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the findings of primary, secondary and/or tertiary intervention studies for neck/upper extremity conditions undertaken between 1999 and 2004 and to compare these results with those of previous reviews. Relevant studies were retrieved through the use of a systematic approach to literature searching and evaluated using a standardised tool. Evidence was then classified according to a “pattern of evidence” approach. Studies were categorised into subgroups depending on the type of intervention: mechanical exposure interventions; production systems/organisational culture interventions and modifier interventions. 31 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings provided evidence to support the use of some mechanical and modifier interventions as approaches for preventing and managing neck/upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions and fibromyalgia. Evidence to support the benefits of production systems/organisational culture interventions was found to be lacking. This review identified no single-dimensional or multi-dimensional strategy for intervention that was considered effective across occupational settings. There is limited information to support the establishment of evidence-based guidelines applicable to a number of industrial sectors.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 14 September 2006

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. oem.2005.025593v1
    2. 64/5/291 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.