rss
Occup Environ Med 2007;64:155-160 doi:10.1136/oem.2006.027383
  • Original article

A case–control study of farming and prostate cancer in African-American and Caucasian men

  1. Tamra E Meyer1,
  2. Ann L Coker1,
  3. Maureen Sanderson2,
  4. Elaine Symanski1
  1. 1University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health at Brownsville, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 MsT E Meyer
 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler, Suite E-625 Houston, TX 77030, USA; tamra.e.meyer{at}uth.tmc.edu
  • Accepted 7 July 2006
  • Published Online First 15 August 2006

Abstract

Objective: To determine the risk of prostate cancer associated with farming by duration, recency and specific activities among African-Americans and Caucasians.

Methods: This population-based case–control study had information on farming-related activities for 405 incident prostate cancer cases and 392 controls matched for age, race and region in South Carolina, USA, from 1999 to 2001. Cases with histologically confirmed, primary invasive prostate cancer who were aged between 65 and 79 years were ascertained through the South Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Appropriately matched controls were identified from the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Beneficiary File. Data were collected using computer-assisted telephone interviewing, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression.

Results: Farming was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Caucasians (aOR 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.7) but not in African-Americans (aOR 1.0; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.6). Regarding specific farming activities, farmers who mixed or applied pesticides had a higher risk of prostate cancer (aOR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.2). Increased risk of prostate cancer was observed only for those farming <5 years.

Conclusions: Increased risk of prostate cancer for farmers in this study may be attributable to pesticide exposure. Racial differences in the association between farming and prostate cancer may be explained by different farming activities or different gene–environment interactions by race.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 15 August 2006

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest occupational, public, community health jobs

Latest occupational, public, community health jobs