rss
Occup Environ Med 2006;63:290-296 doi:10.1136/oem.2005.026047
  • Original article

An evaluation of hospital discharge records as a tool for serious work related injury surveillance

  1. H Alamgir1,
  2. M Koehoorn1,
  3. A Ostry1,
  4. E Tompa2,
  5. P Demers3
  1. 1Department of Health Care & Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  2. 2Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Canada
  3. 3School of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  1. Correspondence to:
 H Alamgir
 Department of Health Care & Epidemiology, 5804 Fairview Avenue, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z3, Canada; hasanat{at}interchange.ubc.ca
  • Accepted 5 January 2006

Abstract

Objectives: To identify and describe work related serious injuries among sawmill workers in British Columbia, Canada using hospital discharge records, and compare the agreement and capturing patterns of the work related indicators available in the hospital discharge records.

Methods: Hospital discharge records were extracted from 1989 to 1998 for a cohort of sawmill workers. Work related injuries were identified from these records using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) external cause of injury codes, which have a fifth digit, and sometimes a fourth digit, indicating place of occurrence, and the responsibility of payment schedule, which identifies workers’ compensation as being responsible for payment.

Results: The most frequent causes of work related hospitalisations were falls, machinery related, overexertion, struck against, cutting or piercing, and struck by falling objects. Almost all cases of machinery related, struck by falling object, and caught in or between injuries were found to be work related. Overall, there was good agreement between the two indicators (ICD-9 code and payment schedule) for identifying work relatedness of injury hospitalisations (kappa = 0.75, p < 0.01). There was better concordance between them for injuries, such as struck against, drowning/suffocation/foreign body, fire/flame/natural/environmental, and explosions/firearms/hot substance/electric current/radiation, and poor concordance for injuries, such as machinery related, struck by falling object, overexertion, cutting or piercing, and caught in or between.

Conclusions: Hospital discharge records are collected for administrative reasons, and thus are readily available. Depending on the coding reliability and validity, hospital discharge records represent an alternative and independent source of information for serious work related injuries. The study findings support the use of hospital discharge records as a potential surveillance system for such injuries.

Footnotes

  • Funding: this study was supported though a doctoral student fellowship by the Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia

  • Competing interest: none

Responses to this article

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.