rss
Occup Environ Med 62:517-523 doi:10.1136/oem.2004.016766
  • Original article

Exposure to traffic related air pollutants: self reported traffic intensity versus GIS modelled exposure

Table 3

 Associations between parental education and subjective (questionnaire) and objective (GIS model) assessment of exposure to traffic related air pollutants in Munich (Germany) and the Netherlands

Parental education
Low Medium High
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Total traffic at home address
Munich
    Low 16 (4.0) 68 (16.8) 321 (79.3)
    Medium 4 (2.5) 13 (8.0) 145 (89.5)
    High 3 (2.9) 20 (19.4) 80 (77.7)
    p value* 0.0410
The Netherlands urban‡
    None/not many 22 (5.4) 85 (20.8) 302 (73.8)
    Moderate 39 (9.8) 107 (27.0) 251 (63.2)
    Many 27 (10.0) 83 (30.7) 160 (59.3)
    p value* 0.0007
GM (GSD) GM (GSD) GM (GSD)
2 test.
†Trend test (two sided).
‡Degree of urbanisation 1 and 2.
GIS based exposure
Munich
    PM2.5 (μg/m3) 12.9 (1.1) 13.6 (1.1) 13.3 (1.1)
    p value† 0.6441
    PM2.5 abs (10−5m−1) 1.63 (1.2) 1.78 (1.2) 1.73 (1.2)
    p value† 0.6885
    NO2 (μg/m3) 24.8 (1.2) 28.1 (1.3) 27.0 (1.2)
    p value† 0.8134
The Netherlands urban‡
    PM2.5 (μg/m3) 17.7 (1.1) 17.7 (1.1) 17.9 (1.1)
    p value† 0.2258
    PM2.5 abs (10−5m−1) 1.91 (1.2) 1.88 (1.2) 1.89 (1.2)
    p value** 0.7082
    NO2 (μg/m3) 29.6 (1.2) 28.6 (1.3) 29.2 (1.2)
    p value† 0.7341

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.