Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma
  1. S M Tarlo1,
  2. G M Liss2
  1. 1University of Toronto, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, Canada
  2. 2University of Toronto, Public Health Sciences, Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Canada
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr S M Tarlo
 Toronto Western Hospital, East Wing 7-449, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, M5T 2S8, Canada; susan.tarloutoronto.ca

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on the paper by Nicholson et al (see page 290)

The article by Nicholson et al in this issue of OEM has an ambitious aim: to assist the Health and Safety Executive in the reduction of occupational asthma by 30% in the next five years.1 The article is very well written and timely. Occupational asthma (OA) as noted by the authors is the most common chronic occupational lung disease now in most industrialised countries and most reported rates have not shown a decline in recent years. However, it is not clear as to what database will be used (both to establish baseline incidence and in the future) to determine changes in incidence of OA which may result from these guides—the SWORD scheme, compensation claims, or a new database?

Is there knowledge which could be implemented to produce a decline of the magnitude stated? Preventive measures for OA designated by the authors as having a hypersensitivity cause, have been well described, and recently reviewed.2,3 Primary prevention can have dramatic effects when it is feasible. It can be achieved by preventing the exposures which lead to sensitisation and asthma. When an allergenic agent can be removed from a workplace, be substituted with a safe alternative, or be completely enclosed so that inhalation exposure does not occur, then rates of occupational asthma from that allergen in that setting should fall by 100%. This has been the observation when natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves are replaced in healthcare settings with non-NRL gloves, and also when enzymes in a workplace are encapsulated as part of a controlled programme. Even when exposure is markedly reduced, such as use of NRL gloves which have a low protein content and are powder-free, NRL occupational asthma rates fall to close to zero. Similarly estimates …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none

Linked Articles