rss
Occup Environ Med 62:74-79 doi:10.1136/oem.2004.013896
  • Original article

A comparison of self-reported sickness absence with absences recorded in employers’ registers: evidence from the Whitehall II study

Table 4

 The association between annual number of sick days and objective measures of health status

Number of annual sick days Physical illness indicator* Prevalent CHD
n (cases) OR (95% CI) n (cases) OR (95% CI)
Odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) are adjusted for age and employment grade.
*Diabetes, diagnosed heart trouble, hypertension, ECG abnormalities, and/or respiratory illness.
Women
Recorded sick days
    0 569 (45) 1.00 581 (17) 1.00
    1−7 901 (92) 1.31 (0.9 to 1.9) 921 (42) 1.58 (0.9 to 2.8)
    8+ 860 (144) 2.28 (1.6 to 3.3) 904 (56) 2.10 (1.2 to 3.7)
Linear trend p<0.001 p = 0.012
Self-reported sick days
    0 388 (31) 1.00 395 (10) 1.00
    1–7 1085 (105) 1.24 (0.8 to 1.9) 1117 (43) 1.59 (0.8 to 3.2)
    8+ 857 (145) 2.29 (1.5 to 3.5) 894 (62) 2.85 (1.4 to 5.6)
Linear trend p<0.001 p<0.001
Men
Recorded sick days
    0 2157 (237) 1.00 2428 (78) 1.00
    1–7 2152 (223) 1.06 (0.9 to 1.3) 2195 (77) 1.14 (0.8 to 1.6)
    8+ 933 (148) 1.68 (1.3 to 2.1) 966 (47) 1.46 (1.0 to 2.1)
Linear trend p<0.001 p = 0.003
Self-reported sick days
    0 1724 (163) 1.00 1744 (50) 1.00
    1–7 2784 (287) 1.13 (0.9 to 1.4) 2846 (91) 1.23 (0.9 to 1.8)
    8+ 971 (158) 1.86 (1.5 to 2.4) 999 (61) 2.25 (1.5 to 3.3)
Linear trend p<0.001 p<0.001

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.