rss
Occup Environ Med 62:63-65 doi:10.1136/oem.2003.012237
  • Short report

Assessing investment in manual handling risk controls: a scoring system for use in observational studies

Table 1

 Aspects of risk management covered in questionnaire and derivation of the MARCH score

Aspect of risk management Score No. of hospitals
n (%)
*Only applicable in English trusts.
1. Defined management responsibility for manual handling issues at board level 0 = none 13 (12)
1 = yes, but with complex or unclear route of communication with ward manager 27 (25)
2 = yes, and with short and simple route of communication with ward manager 69 (63)
2. Written, trust-wide policy for manual handling 0 = none 1 (1)
1 = generic policy only, not ward specific (not applicable or information missing) 59 (54)
2 = generic policy and also ward specific policies 49 (45)
3. Score on health and safety section of risk management audit in NHS Litigation Authority Controls Assurance Baseline Assessment 2000* 0 = lowest third of distribution 21 (19)
1 = middle third of distribution (not applicable or information missing) 63 (58)
2 = highest third of distribution 25 (23)
4. Routine collection of data on sickness absence and ill-health retirement 0 = none 1 (1)
1 = data collected routinely on either sickness absence or ill-health retirement, but not both (or information missing) 51 (47)
2 = data collected routinely on both sickness absence and ill-health retirement 57 (52)
5. Data on manual handling incidents collected routinely and provided to study team on request 0 = not collected 2 (2)
1 = collected but not provided (or information missing) 27 (25)
2 = collected and provided 80 (73)
6. Salary allocation for manual handling specialist(s) per 1000 staff 0 = lowest third of distribution 40 (37)
1 = middle third of distribution or salary allocated but amount unknown 39 (36)
2 = highest third of distribution 30 (28)
7. Time per 1000 staff of manual handling specialist(s) allocated to advising about risks and controls 0 = lowest third of distribution 39 (36)
1 = middle third of distribution or specialist appointed but time allocation unknown 40 (37)
2 = highest third of distribution 30 (28)
8. Guidelines on referral to occupational health department for nurses with back problems 0 = none 15 (14)
1 = guidelines produced, but referral not always within first four weeks of sickness absence (or information missing) 66 (61)
2 = guidelines produced and referral within first four weeks of sickness absence 28 (26)
9. Rapid access to physiotherapy for nurses with back problems 0 = none 25 (23)
1 = available, but waiting time >2 weeks (or information missing) 18 (17)
2 = available and waiting time ⩽2 weeks 66 (61)
10. Level of manual handling training 0 = <1 day at baseline 44 (40)
1 = other (or information missing) 24 (22)
2 = ⩾1 day at baseline plus ⩾½ day refresher at least once per year 41 (38)
11. Records of attendance for manual handling training and proportion of nurses with attendance in past year 0 = training records kept only at ward level 13 (12)
1 = training records kept centrally and attendance rate in lower half of distribution (or information missing) 64 (59)
2 = training records kept centrally and attendance rate in upper half of distribution 32 (29)
12. Proportion of clinical wards with accessible lifting equipment 0 = ⩽80% of wards have either hoists or small aids 30 (28)
1 = >80% of wards have both hoists and small aids, but some or all are shared with other wards (or information missing) 43 (39)
2 = >80% of wards have both hoists and small aids for single ward use 36 (33)

This Article

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.