rss
Occup Environ Med 2003;60:82-89 doi:10.1136/oem.60.2.82
  • Original article

Acute effects of winter air pollution on respiratory function in schoolchildren in southern England

  1. J L Peacock1,
  2. P Symonds2,
  3. P Jackson3,
  4. S A Bremner1,
  5. J F Scarlett1,
  6. D P Strachan1,
  7. H R Anderson1
  1. 1Department of Public Health Sciences, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK
  2. 2Environmental Health Department, Medway Council, Civic Centre, Rochester, Kent ME2 4AW, UK
  3. 3School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr J L Peacock, Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK;
 j.peacock{at}sghms.ac.uk
  • Accepted 14 May 2002

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the acute health effects of winter outdoor air pollution (nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), sulphur dioxide (SO2), sulphate (SO42−) ,and particles (PM10)) on schoolchildren in an area of southern England where levels of SO2 had been reported to be high.

Methods: A total of 179 children, aged 7–13, from three schools (two urban and one rural location), were included. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and presence or absence of upper respiratory infections were recorded on 63 school days from 1 November 1996 to 14 February 1997. Air pollution and meteorological data were taken from monitors at each school site. The analysis regressed daily PEFR on pollutant level adjusting for confounders and serial correlation and calculated a weighted pooled estimate of effect overall for each pollutant. In addition, large decrements in PEFR were analysed as a binary outcome. Same day, lag 1, lag 2, and a five day average of pollutant levels were used.

Results: There were no clear effects of any pollutant on mean PEFR. In addition, we analysed large PEFR decrements (a binary outcome), observing consistent negative associations with NO2, SO42−, and PM10, although few lag/pollutant combinations were significant: odds ratios (95% CI) for five day average effect: NO2 24 h average 1.043 (1.000 to 1.089), SO42− 1.090 (0.898 to 1.322), PM10 1.037 (0.992 to 1.084). The observed effects of PM10 (only) were stronger in wheezy children (1.114 (1.057 to 1.174)). There were no consistent negative associations between large decrements and ozone or SO2 .

Conclusions: There is no strong evidence for acute effects of winter outdoor air pollution on mean PEFR overall in this area, but there is evidence for negative effects on large PEFR decrements.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
     This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of OEM.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for OEM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.