Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

Electronic Letters to:

P Lercher, G W Evans, M Meis, W W Kofler
Ambient neighbourhood noise and children's mental health
Occup Environ Med 2002; 59: 380-386 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Noise exposure and child mental health or quality of life ?
Mary M Haines, Stephen.A.Stansfeld   (13 June 2002)

Noise exposure and child mental health or quality of life ? 13 June 2002
  Top
Mary M Haines,
Lecturer in Psychology
Psychiatry Department, Barts and the London, Queen Mary, University of London,
Stephen.A.Stansfeld

Send letter to journal:
Re: Noise exposure and child mental health or quality of life ?

m.m.haines{at}qmul.ac.uk Mary M Haines, et al.

Dear Editor,

Readers may be interested to know that there are other recent studies that have provided equivocal evidence concerning the effects of environmental noise on children's mental health that have not been cited in this article. These new results published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine need to be considered in the light of fact there has not been clear research evidence to support or dispute whether noise exposure in linked to mental health problems in children.

We have found inconsistent mental health results in our three recent studies examining the impact of aircraft noise on child health around Heathrow airport (Haines et al., 2001a,b,c). In the West London Schools Study (Haines et al., 2001c) aircraft noise was weakly associated with hyperactivity and psychological morbidity as measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ, Goodman, 1994) completed by parents. The SDQ is one of the most widely used psychometrically valid instruments to detect psychological morbidity in children in both the UK and internationally. However, in our other two studies using both the parent completed SDQ, the teacher completed Student Behaviour Checklist and child self-reported Depression (Child Depression Inventory, CDI) and Anxiety (Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale) we did not find any between mental ill-health and aircraft noise exposure (Haines et al., 2001a, 2001b).

The Austrian results should be placed within the context of existing studies with respect to two points: i) the construct being measured in the Austrian study; ii) the small effect size and inconsistency with previous research.

In the Heathrow studies we used internationally recognised child mental health screening tools, that have equivalent psychometric properties to the KINDL (only used in German speaking countries). It is worth noting that the KINDL is normally defined as a "valid and reliable index of quality of life" (Evans et al., 1995) rather than a sensitive screening tool to detect specific mental health problems. It is possible that the mental health results reported by Lercher and colleagues are tapping into impaired quality of life and well-being rather than a precise mental health outcome such as 'depression'. The definition of 'mental health' used by the authors needs to be clarified. The fact that the Austrian results do not replicate our Heathrow results raises the question - does the KINDL measure well being and quality of life rather than mental health ? Furthermore, teacher reports of classroom adjustment would not normally be classified as a 'mental health'. Perhaps it might be more accurate to conclude from the Austrian research that: "ambient levels of noise in the community are associated with decreased quality of life and poorer classroom behaviour (rather than 'mental health') in elementary school children".

In summary, we feel that new research is necessary to provide further evidence about the effects of noise on child mental health. Even though, Peter Lercher and colleagues have taken forward the field of research forward with their two stage study design strategy, there is still more work to be done to clarify the terminology and measurement of mental health in the field of non-auditory health effects of noise. Specifically, a clear definitional and operational distinction needs to be made between stress/well-being/quality of life and mental health.

Yours faithfully,

Dr Mary Haines
Lecturer in Psychology

Professor Stephen Stansfeld
Professor of Psychiatry

References:

Goodman, R. (1994). A modified version of the Rutter Parent Questionnaire including extra items on children's strengths: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35(8), 1483-1494.

Haines, M.M., Stansfeld, S.A., Job, R.F.S., Berglund, B. & Head, J. (2001a). Chronic aircraft noise exposure, stress responses mental health and cognitive performance in school children. Psychological Medicine, 31, 265-277.

Haines, M.M., Stansfeld, S.A., Job, R.F.S, Berglund, B. & Head, J. (2001b). A follow-up study of the effects of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child stress responses and cognition. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 839-845.

Haines, M.M., Stansfeld, S.A., Brentnall, S., Head, J., Berry, B., Jiggins, M., & Hygge, S. (2001c). West London Schools Study: the effect of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child health. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1385-1396.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs