Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 September 2008

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 20 December 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035725
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Original Article

Estimating Reduction in Occupational Disease Burden Following Reduction in Exposure

Ben G Armstrong 1* and Andrew Darnton 2

1 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Med, United Kingdom
2 Health and Safety Executive, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ben.armstrong{at}lshtm.ac.uk.

Accepted 30 November 2007


Abstract

Objectives: Many occupational exposures causing disease cannot feasibly be eliminated entirely, but policies that reduce the exposures may be under consideration. This paper sets out to clarify how to estimate the reduction in occupational disease following a reduction in exposure, and show a real-data illustration of doing this.

Methods. Modest extensions of standard expressions for attributable fractions permit estimation of fractions by which cases would be reduced by policies that do not eliminate exposure but change exposure distributions. However, this requires information on the exposure-response relationship and on distribution of exposures

Results. From hypothetical scenarios and a real example we explored how attributable cases were distributed by exposure level, and in particular the proportion by which attributable cancers are reduced by eliminating exposures above a limit (the classic occupational limit regulation). We show how this depends on the shape of the exposure-response relationship and to some extent the shape of the exposure distribution, as well as on the proportion exposed above the limit. For linear no-threshold relationships and left-skewed exposure distributions, the majority of the burden may be in a large number of persons experiencing small relative risks, and thus may not be tackled by a strategy to reduce exposures above a certain limit..

Conclusion: With appropriate data, estimating the disease burden in terms of the distribution of exposure is straightforward and can help to clarify the likely outcome of an intervention.

Keywords: cancer, occupation, risk, statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Palmer, K. (2008). Work in Brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: i-i [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs