Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 16 April 2008

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 3 April 2008. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035246
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
oem.2007.035246v1
oem.2007.035246v2    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shirangi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, C. D. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shirangi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, C. D. J

Original Article

Maternal Occupational Exposures and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion in Veterinary Practice

Adeleh Shirangi 1*, Lin Fritschi 2 and C. D'Arcy J Holman 3

1 Imperial college of London, United Kingdom
2 The university of Western Australia, Australia
3 The University of Western Australia, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.shirangi{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Accepted 1 February 2008


*   Abstract

Objectives: To examine the relationship between occupational exposures and spontaneous abortion in female veterinarians.

Methods: The Health Risks of Australian Veterinarians project (HRAV) was conducted as a questionnaire-based survey of all graduates from Australian veterinary schools during the 40-year period 1960-2000. Of 5,748 eligible veterinarians who were sent the questionnaires, 2,800 replied including 1,197 females (42.8%). The response rate was 59% of women veterinarians eligible to participate. The pregnancy of women was defined as the unit of analysis. We restricted analyses to pregnancies of those women who reported being employed when the pregnancy began and were working only in clinical practice. Of 1,355 pregnancies in total in the file, 940 pregnancies were eligible for the final analysis. Self-reported occupational exposures to anesthetic gases, x-rays, pesticides and long working hours in relation to spontaneous abortion were examined.

Results: In a multiple logistic regression controlling for the 12 potential confounders, there was more than two-fold significant increase (OR: 2.49 95% CI: 1.02, 6.04) in the risk of spontaneous abortion in women exposed to un-scavenged anesthetic gases for one or more hours per week. Veterinarians who reported performing more than five radiographic examinations per week had a statistically significant elevated risk of spontaneous abortion compared to those who performed less than five (OR:1.82 95%:CI:1.17-2.82). There was also about two–fold significant increased risk of spontaneous abortion in women who used pesticides at work (OR:1.88 95% CI: 1.18-3.00).

Conclusion: Female veterinarians, particularly those of childbearing age, should be fully informed of the possible reproductive effects of un-scavenged anesthetic gases, ionizing radiation and pesticide exposure and reduce their exposure by use of protective devices during pregnancy and the time when they are planning to become pregnant.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.