Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2008

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 11 July 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.032243
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Original Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating an Alternative Mouse and Forearm Support on Upper Body Discomfort and Musculoskeletal Disorders among Engineers

Craig F Conlon 1, Niklas Krause 2 and David M Rempel 2*

1 University of California, Los Angeles, United States
2 University of California, San Francisco, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rempel{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.

Accepted 29 June 2007


Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this intervention study was to determine the effects of an alternative mouse and/or a forearm support board on the change in upper body discomfort scores and the development of incident musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: This randomized controlled intervention trial followed 206 engineers for one year. Participants were randomized to receive (1) a conventional mouse only, (2) an alternative mouse only, (3) a forearm support board, or (4) an alternative mouse plus forearm support board. Outcome measures included weekly upper body discomfort scores and incident musculoskeletal disorders. Results: During the study, 42 participants were diagnosed with an incident musculoskeletal disorder. The group that received the forearm support board experienced a reduction of their right upper extremity discomfort (beta-coefficient = -0.35, 95% C.I. = -0.67 to -0.03) in comparison to those who did not receive a forearm board. The group that received the alternative mouse had a protective, but non-significant (p=0.20), effect on incident cases of right upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (HR=0.57, 95% C.I.= 0.24 to 1.34) and a non-significant reduction in neck-shoulder discomfort (beta-coefficient = -0.23, 95% C.I.=-.056 to 0.10) in comparison to those who received a conventional mouse. Conclusions: In engineers, who use a computer for more than 20 hours per week, a forearm support board may reduce right upper extremity discomfort attributed to computer use.

Keywords: RCT, computer work, ergonomics, intervention study, neuropathy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Growing knowledge about "what works" to prevent work injuries
Benjamin C Amick
Occup. Environ. Med. 2008 65: 297-298. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Amick, B. C (2008). Growing knowledge about "what works" to prevent work injuries. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 297-298 [Full Text]  
  • Palmer, K. (2008). Work in Brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 297-297 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs