Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2007

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 20 December 2006. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.028662
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Original Article

The Validation of Work-related Self-reported Asthma Exacerbation

Aimee R Bolen 1*, Paul K Henneberger 2, Xiaoming Liang 1, Susan R Sama 3, Peggy A Preusse 4, Richard A Rosiello 4 and Donald K Milton 3

1 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, United States
2 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, United Kingdom
3 Harvard School of Public Health; Department of Work Environment, UMASS, United States
4 Fallon Clinic Research Department, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abolen{at}health-ra.com.

Accepted 28 October 2006


Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the validity of work-related self-reported exacerbation of asthma using the findings from serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements as the standard.

Methods: Adults with asthma treated in a health maintenance organization were asked to conduct serial spirometry testing at home and at work for 3 weeks. Self-reported respiratory symptoms and medication use were recorded in two ways: a daily log completed concurrently with the serial PEF testing and a telephone questionnaire administered after the PEF testing. Three researchers evaluated the serial PEF records and judged whether a work relationship was evident.

Results: Ninety-five (25%) of 382 working adults with asthma provided adequate serial PEF data, and 13 (14% of 95) were judged to have workplace exacerbation of asthma based on these data. Self-reported concurrent medication use was the most valid single operational definition, with a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 65%.

Conclusions: Self-reports of symptoms and medication use failed to identify many people who had evidence of workplace exacerbation of asthma based on serial PEF measurements.

Keywords: asthma, serial spirometry, workplace studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tarlo, S. M., Malo, J.-L., on behalf of the Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asth, (2009). An Official ATS Proceedings: Asthma in the Workplace: The Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace: Answered and Unanswered Questions. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6: 339-349 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tarlo, S. M., Balmes, J., Balkissoon, R., Beach, J., Beckett, W., Bernstein, D., Blanc, P. D., Brooks, S. M., Cowl, C. T., Daroowalla, F., Harber, P., Lemiere, C., Liss, G. M., Pacheco, K. A., Redlich, C. A., Rowe, B., Heitzer, J. (2008). Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement. Chest 134: 1S-41S [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs