Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 March 2007

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 15 August 2006. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.027383
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Original Article

A case-control study of farming and prostate cancer in African-American and Caucasian men

Tamra E Meyer 1*, Ann L Coker 1, Maureen Sanderson 2 and Elaine Symanski 1

1 University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health, United States
2 University of Texas at Houston School of Public Health at Brownsville, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tamra.e.meyer{at}uth.tmc.edu.

Accepted 7 July 2006


Abstract

Objectives: To determine the risk of prostate cancer associated with farming by duration, recency, and specific activities among African-Americans and Caucasians. Methods: This population-based case-control study had information on farming-related activities for 405 incident prostate cancer cases and 392 controls matched on age, race, and region in South Carolina from 1999-2001. Histologically confirmed, primary invasive prostate cancer cases between the ages of 65-79 years were ascertained through the South Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Appropriately matched controls were identified from the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare Beneficiary File. Data were collected using computer assisted telephone interviewing and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Results: Farming was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Caucasians (aOR=1.8; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.3-2.7) but not African-Americans (aOR=1.0; 95% CI=0.6-1.6). Among specific farming activities, farmers who mixed or applied pesticides had higher prostate cancer risk (aOR=1.6; 95% CI=1.2-2.2). Increased risk of prostate cancer was only observed for those farming fewer than 5 years. Conclusions: Increased risk of prostate cancer for farmers in this study may be attributable to pesticide exposure. Racial differences in the association between farming and prostate cancer may be explained by different farming activities or different gene-environment interactions by race.

Keywords: Agriculture, Epidemiology, Occupations, Prostatic Neoplasms, Race


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Farming and prostate cancer
Vilhjalmur Rafnsson
Occup. Environ. Med. 2007 64: 143. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.-P., Giudice, L. C., Hauser, R., Prins, G. S., Soto, A. M., Zoeller, R. T., Gore, A. C. (2009). Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement. Endocr. Rev. 30: 293-342 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Prins, G. S (2008). Endocrine disruptors and prostate cancer risk. Endocr Relat Cancer 15: 649-656 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rafnsson, V. (2007). Farming and prostate cancer. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 143-143 [Full Text]  
  • Palmer, K. (2007). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 141-141 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs