Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 15 August 2006. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.027151
Original Article |
Comparison of parental reports of smoking and residential air nicotine concentrations in children
1 Utrecht University, Netherlands
2 Yale University, United States
3 GSF-National Research Centre for Environment and Health, Germany
4 Karolinska Institute and Stockholm County Council, Sweden
5 University of Rostock, Germany
6 IRAS, Netherlands
7 Karolinska Institute and Stockholm County Council, Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: u.gehring{at}iras.uu.nl.
Accepted 29 June 2006
Abstract
Background: Using questionnaires to assess childrens residential exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) may result in misclassification from recall and response bias. Questionnaire data has frequently been validated against urinary cotinine measurements, but rarely against actual measurements of residential air nicotine. Objective: To compare questionnaire-reported smoking with air nicotine concentrations in a large population of children and with urinary cotinine levels in a sub-population, and to assess the potential impact of the symptom status of the children on the agreement between different measures of exposure. Methods: We assessed residential exposure to ETS in 347 German, 335 Dutch, and 354 Swedish pre-school and schoolchildren by questionnaire and by air nicotine measurements, and in a subset of 307 German children by urinary cotinine measurements. We then compared the different measures of ETS exposure. Results: In all countries, air nicotine concentrations increased with increasing questionnaire-reported smoking in a dose-response fashion. Specificity and negative predictive values of questionnaire reports for nicotine concentrations were excellent. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were moderate to good. Excluding occasional smokers, the overall percentage of homes misclassified was 6.9, 6.7 and 5.1% in Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden, respectively. Similar results were found for the agreement of urinary cotinine concentrations with questionnaire-reports and air nicotine levels. There was no indication of an underreporting by parents of symptomatic children. Conclusion: Despite some misclassification, questionnaire-reports are an inexpensive and valid estimate of residential ETS exposure among pre-school and school children.
Keywords: air nicotine, environmental tobacco smoke, questionnaire, urinary cotinine
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bolte, G., Fromme, H., for the GME Study Group,
(2009). Socioeconomic determinants of children's environmental tobacco smoke exposure and family's home smoking policy. Eur J Public Health
19: 52-58
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Gabriele, C., Asgarali, R., Jaddoe, V. W., Hofman, A., Moll, H. A., de Jongste, J. C.
(2008). Smoke exposure, airway symptoms and exhaled nitric oxide in infants: the Generation R study. Eur Respir J
32: 307-313
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Wang, C., Salam, M. T., Islam, T., Wenten, M., Gauderman, W. J., Gilliland, F. D.
(2008). Effects of In Utero and Childhood Tobacco Smoke Exposure and {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Genotype on Childhood Asthma and Wheezing. Pediatrics
122: e107-e114
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Matt, G. E., Bernert, J. T., Hovell, M. F.
(2008). Measuring Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Children: An Ecological Measurement Approach. J Pediatr Psychol
33: 156-175
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Salam, M. T., Gauderman, W. J., McConnell, R., Lin, P.-C., Gilliland, F. D.
(2007). Transforming Growth Factor- 1 C-509T Polymorphism, Oxidant Stress, and Early-Onset Childhood Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
176: 1192-1199
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Hughes, G.
(2007). Hygieia. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
61: 272-272
[Full Text] -
Palmer, K.
(2006). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med.
63: 717a-717a
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
