Validity of questionnaire self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage during a 4 week period

Sigurd Mikkelsen ^1*, Imogen Vilstrup ², Christina Funch Lassen ¹, Ann Isabel Kryger ¹, Jane Frølund Thomsen ¹ and Johan Hviid Andersen ²

¹ Department of Occupational Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
² Department of Occupational Medicine, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: simi{at}glostruphosp.kbhamt.dk.

Accepted 23 February 2007

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to examine the validity and potential biases in self-reports of computer, mouse, and keyboard usage times, compared to objective recordings. Methods: A study population including 1211 persons was asked in a questionnaire to estimate the average time they had worked with computer, mouse, and keyboard during the past 4 working weeks. During the same period, a software program recorded these activities objectively. The study was part of a 1-year follow-up study from 2000 to 2001 of musculoskeletal outcomes among Danish computer workers. Results: Self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage times were positively associated with objectively measured activity, but the validity was low. Self-reports explained only between a quarter and a third of the variance of objectively measured activity, and was even lower for one measure (keyboard time). Self-reports overestimated usage times. Overestimation was large at low levels and declined with increasing levels of objectively measured activity. Mouse usage time proportion was an exception with a near 1:1 relationship. Variability in objectively measured activity, arm pain, gender, and age influenced self-reports in a systematic way, but the effects were modest and sometimes in different directions. Conclusion: Self-reported durations of computer activities are positively associated with objective measures but they are quite inaccurate. Studies using self-reports to establish relations between computer work times and musculoskeletal pain could be biased and lead to falsely increased or decreased risk estimates.

Keywords: Activity monitoring, Computer work, Exposure assessment, Self-report, Validity

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Andersen, J H, Harhoff, M, Grimstrup, S, Vilstrup, I, Lassen, C F, Brandt, L P A, Kryger, A I, Overgaard, E, Hansen, K D, Mikkelsen, S (2008). Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 126-131 [Abstract] [Full Text]