Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2007

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 26 March 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.026351
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
oem.2005.026351v1
64/8/541    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, J. H.

Original Article

Validity of questionnaire self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage during a 4 week period

Sigurd Mikkelsen 1*, Imogen Vilstrup 2, Christina Funch Lassen 1, Ann Isabel Kryger 1, Jane Frølund Thomsen 1 and Johan Hviid Andersen 2

1 Department of Occupational Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
2 Department of Occupational Medicine, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: simi{at}glostruphosp.kbhamt.dk.

Accepted 23 February 2007


*   Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to examine the validity and potential biases in self-reports of computer, mouse, and keyboard usage times, compared to objective recordings. Methods: A study population including 1211 persons was asked in a questionnaire to estimate the average time they had worked with computer, mouse, and keyboard during the past 4 working weeks. During the same period, a software program recorded these activities objectively. The study was part of a 1-year follow-up study from 2000 to 2001 of musculoskeletal outcomes among Danish computer workers. Results: Self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage times were positively associated with objectively measured activity, but the validity was low. Self-reports explained only between a quarter and a third of the variance of objectively measured activity, and was even lower for one measure (keyboard time). Self-reports overestimated usage times. Overestimation was large at low levels and declined with increasing levels of objectively measured activity. Mouse usage time proportion was an exception with a near 1:1 relationship. Variability in objectively measured activity, arm pain, gender, and age influenced self-reports in a systematic way, but the effects were modest and sometimes in different directions. Conclusion: Self-reported durations of computer activities are positively associated with objective measures but they are quite inaccurate. Studies using self-reports to establish relations between computer work times and musculoskeletal pain could be biased and lead to falsely increased or decreased risk estimates.


Keywords: Activity monitoring, Computer work, Exposure assessment, Self-report, Validity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J H Andersen, M Harhoff, S Grimstrup, I Vilstrup, C F Lassen, L P A Brandt, A I Kryger, E Overgaard, K D Hansen, and S Mikkelsen
Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2008; 65(2): 126 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.