Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2007

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 20 December 2006. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.026187
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Review Article

Air pollution and Doctors’ House Calls for respiratory diseases in Greater Paris area (2000-2003)

Benoit Chardon 1*, Agnès Lefranc 1, Denis Granados 1 and Isabelle Grémy 1

1 Regional Observatory of Health, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: b.chardon{at}ors-idf.org.

Accepted 28 October 2006


Abstract

Objectives: This study describes the short term relationships between the daily levels of PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and the number of doctors’ house calls for asthma, upper and lower respiratory diseases in Greater Paris for the years 2000-2003. Doctors’ house calls are a relevant health indicator for the study of short-term health effects of air pollution. Indeed, it is potentially more sensitive than indicators such as general hospital admissions due to the slightest severity of the diseases motivating the call.

Methods: Time-series analysis were used. The daily numbers of doctor’s house calls were adjusted for time trends, seasonal factors, day of the week, influenza, weather and pollen. Up to 15 days of lag between the exposure and the health effects was considered using distributed lag models.

Results: A total of about 1,760,000 doctors’ house calls for all causes occurred during the study period, among which 8027 for asthma, 52,928 for lower respiratory diseases (LRD) and 74,845 for upper respiratory diseases (URD). No significant risk increase was found between air pollution and doctors’ house calls for asthma. No significant association was found between NO2 and doctors’ house calls. An increase of 10 µg/m3 in the mean levels of PM10 encountered during the 3 previous days was associated with an increase of 3 % [0.8 %; 5.3 %] in the number of doctor’s house calls for URD or LRD. An increase of 5.9 % [2.9 %; 9.0 %] was observed in association with an increase of 10 µg/m3 in the levels of PM2.5. Considering up to 15 days between exposure and health outcomes, effects persist until 4 days after exposure and then decrease progressively. No morbidity displacement was observed.

Conclusion: Our study shows a significant heath effect of ambient particles (PM2.5 and PM10). When compared to the relative risks obtained for mortality or hospital admissions in the same area, the values of the relative risks obtained in this study confirm the higher sensibility of doctor’s house calls for respiratory diseases as an health indicator.

Keywords: air pollution, morbidity, primary care, respiratory diseases, time-series


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Larrieu, S., Lefranc, A., Gault, G., Chatignoux, E., Couvy, F., Jouves, B., Filleul, L. (2009). Are the Short-term Effects of Air Pollution Restricted to Cardiorespiratory Diseases?. Am J Epidemiol 169: 1201-1208 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs