Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mimura, C
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mimura, C
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, P
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:10-15
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


REVIEW

The effectiveness of current approaches to workplace stress management in the nursing profession: an evidence based literature review

C Mimura, P Griffiths

Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr P Griffiths, Primary and Intermedicate Care Section, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK;
peter.griffiths{at}kcl.ac.uk

The effectiveness of current approaches to workplace stress management for nurses was assessed through a systematic review. Seven randomised controlled trials and three prospective cohort studies assessing the effectiveness of a stress management programmes were identified and reviewed. The quality of research identified was weak. There is more evidence for the effectiveness of programmes based on providing personal support than environmental management to reduce stressors. However, since the number and quality of studies is low, the question as to which, if any, approach is more effective cannot be answered definitively. Further research is required before clear recommendations for the use of particular interventions for nursing work related stress can be made.


Keywords: occupational stress; evaluation; systematic review; nursing; evidence based practice

Abbreviations: MD, mean difference; PCS, prospective cohort study; RCT, randomised controlled trial




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
S.S. Leone, M.J.H. Huibers, J.A. Knottnerus, and I.J. Kant
Similarities, overlap and differences between burnout and prolonged fatigue in the working population
QJM, October 1, 2007; 100(10): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
T. A. Richards, D. Oman, J. Hedberg, C. E. Thoresen, and J. Bowden
A Qualitative Examination of a Spiritually-Based Intervention and Self-Management in the Workplace.
Nurs Sci Q, July 1, 2006; 19(3): 231 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
W Eriksen
Work factors as predictors of persistent fatigue: a prospective study of nurses' aides
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2006; 63(6): 428 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.