WORK IN BRIEF

Substantial evidence suggests that the risk of lung cancer is magnified among individuals exposed to both tobacco smoke and asbestos. Previous studies have given inconsistent estimates of the strength of this interaction, possibly because of variation in several time related factors, such as cohort age, duration of follow up, and time since exposure, but findings reported by Reid et al from a study of Australian crocidolite miners and millers may help shed light on this question.¹ Among this mature cohort of 2935 workers who were last exposed to asbestos over 30 years ago, on average, 18% had never smoked and 40% had quit. With adjustment for asbestos exposure, the risk of lung cancer declined steeply with time since ceasing smoking. The relative effect of asbestos appeared to be greater among non-smokers relative to smokers, consistent with greater-than-additive interaction. Scientific and practical implications of the research are discussed in an accompanying comment by Case.²

Workplace exacerbation of asthma is well known to occupational physicians, but reliable estimates of how often this occurs in the population are difficult to obtain. A study reported by Henneberger et al takes on this problem using data from asthmatic members of a large health care organisation, a standardised case definition and expert assessment of occupational exposure to irritants and sensitisers.³ About 60% of the men and 40% of the women were judged to have occupational exposures, and 23% had evidence of symptoms aggravated by work. Only 12% had a combination of symptoms and exposure consistent with strong indications of work relatedness, however. The authors conclude that workplace exacerbation of asthma symptoms is common and advise physicians to consider the occupations of people with asthma.

Farchi et al report results from a study of environmental exposures and respiratory diseases in children that is notable for having followed a cohort of 4000 Rome schoolchildren for five years, investigating the occurrence of hospitalisation for respiratory conditions in relation to indoor and outdoor exposures.⁴ Hospitalisation for all respiratory conditions in the children was associated with paternal, but not maternal, smoking, and upper respiratory infections were associated with traffic—notably heavy truck traffic—near the residence. A clear exposure-response relation was seen between NO₂ and both upper and lower respiratory infections.

Other reports include findings of elevated risk of congenital malformations in offspring of male painters,⁵ two different approaches to predicting the occurrence of sickness absence,^6,7 and evidence of excess lung cancer, but no dose-response relationship, among German workers exposed to carbon black.⁸

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati