POSTSCRIPT
Letter
Identifying tumour sites in the IARC Monographs
Correspondence to:
V J Cogliano, IARC Monographs Programme, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; cogliano@iarc.fr
Accepted 17 February 2009
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The letter from Drs Huff and Infante1 provides an opportunity to correct some misperceptions that have developed about the IARC Monographs. First, Huff and Infante call on IARC to make "appropriate adjustments" and "properly amend" the summaries for formaldehyde and other monographs. It is important to understand that IARC does not change summaries, which are developed by independent working groups of scientists who conducted the original research. This principle is meant to ensure confidence that IARC evaluations are free from the pressures that interested parties often use to influence public agencies.
A second point concerns the temporal relationship between the formaldehyde monograph and IARCs amended guidelines (the preamble). The formaldehyde working group met and developed its conclusions in June 2004. The preamble amendment process2 began in March 2005 and IARC posted the draft preamble on its website for public comment from August to October 2005. Huff and Infante
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
