EDITORIALS
From cross-sectional survey to cohort study
Correspondence to:
Elsebeth Lynge, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; elsebeth@pubhealth.ku.dk
Accepted 19 May 2006
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Before the Second World War, case reports had indicated that working with certain chemicals might lead to the development of cancer. After the war, these occupational risks were investigated more thoroughly. Arsenic had long been suspected to be carcinogenic, and in 1945 the British Factory Department set up a committee to investigate the possible relationship between arsenic exposure and lung cancer. A Bradford Hill and E Lewis Faning investigated mortality among workers in a factory producing arsenic powder. Their report published in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine in 19481 is the first description, I have come across, of how to undertake a proper historical cohort study of an occupational group. According to the authors, information required for the study included: "(a) a list of the male employees, divided according to their occupation, for each year from 1943 ... back to 1900; (b) the approximate dates of birth of these
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Loomis, D.
(2009). Sixty-five years of the Journal go online. Occup. Environ. Med.
66: 425-426
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
