POSTSCRIPT
Letters
Authors response
North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Helen Francis, North West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; helen.c.francis@manchester.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We thank Dr Preece for his comments. We believe that he is justified in questioning the make-up of the panel and that this has a significant bias for tertiary assessment of occupational lung disease. However, our aim in performing this process was to get this group of experts to agree on "definitions" with a view to unifying the label at this later clinical stage of the process.1 In addition, we hoped that the requirements of a specialist occupational lung disease assessment service would form a basis for developing a "standards of care" document for those giving expert medical advice in this specialist field. We felt that it was appropriate to carry out the process from this standpoint, as if this body could not agree on what constitutes occupational asthma or work aggravated asthma in principal, how could we work towards an agreed process for evaluation at all levels?
A
Relevant Article
-
Definition of occupational asthma
Occup. Environ. Med. 2008 65: 148.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
