POSTSCRIPT
Letters
Occupational medicine and asthma
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The article by Francis et al (Occup Environ Med 2007;64:361–5) is interesting and makes an important contribution to clinical practice. It is a pity, however, that a consensus on definition did not precede the production of evidence-based guidelines1 to make sure that the relevance of the evidence was consistent with the emerging consensus.
I note that the consensus panel comprised a group of experts in occupational respiratory diseases based in major hospitals. As far as I can tell only two of the panel are accredited specialists in occupational medicine. While the individual credentials of the panel members are impeccable, full participation by practising occupational physicians rooted in the workplaces where exposure occurs would have given better balance to the panel as a whole.
I am left wondering if the absence of practising occupational physicians is an unfortunate oversight, a reflection of how uncommon occupational asthma is
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
