Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2006;63:73-78; doi:10.1136/oem.2004.017616
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radon, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radon, K
Topic Collections
Right arrow OEM Education
Right arrowRelated Article

EDUCATION

THE TWO SIDES OF THE "ENDOTOXIN COIN"

K Radon

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr K Radon
Unit for Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology & Net Teaching, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; katja.radon@med.uni-muenchen.de

Keywords: asthma; atopy; chronic bronchitis; farmer; hygiene hypothesis

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Endotoxins, part of the outer membrane of Gram negative bacteria, are a potent inducer of neutrophilic airway inflammation. A large number of studies in occupational epidemiology has shown that exposure to endotoxins increases the likelihood of organic dust toxic syndrome, chronic bronchitis, and asthma-like syndrome. In contrast, it has been shown that exposure to endotoxins in the occupational and environmental setting protects from respiratory allergies and sensitisation to allergens.

With respect to asthma, the evidence is conflicting at first glance. While some studies indicated an increased risk of asthma after endotoxin exposure, others have shown that endotoxin exposure protects from asthma. However, these differences can be explained when different asthma phenotypes are taken into account. The risk of atopic asthma, mainly dominated by eosinophilic response, is decreased in those exposed to endotoxins. In contrast, the risk of non-atopic asthma, characterised by neutrophilic response, is enhanced in subjects with higher endotoxin . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Article

Can strenuous leisure time physical activity prevent psychological complaints in a working population?
C M Bernaards, M P Jans, S G van den Heuvel, I J Hendriksen, I L Houtman, and P M Bongers
Occup. Environ. Med. 2006 63: 10-16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
C. Parks, G. Cooper, M. Dooley, M. Park, E. Treadwell, and G. Gilkeson
Childhood agricultural and adult occupational exposures to organic dusts in a population-based case-control study of systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, August 1, 2008; 17(8): 711 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.