Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2005;62:741-742; doi:10.1136/oem.2005.022236
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

COMMENTARY

Asthma

Cost effectiveness of surveillance for isocyanate asthma: finding an occupational health policy framework

A D LaMontagne

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Associate Professor A D LaMontagne
Centre for Health and Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia; alamonta@unimelb.edu.au


Commentary on the paper by Wild et al (see page 743)

Keywords: cost effectiveness; isocyanates; occupational asthma; policy

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Wild et al present an original cost effectiveness analysis for medical surveillance for isocyanate asthma in this issue of OEM.1 The general case for surveillance for isocyanate asthma is a compelling one. Most occupational physicians, practitioners, and researchers might rightly expect that if a cost effectiveness (CE) case cannot be made for this agent, it would be hard to make a case for most others. The causal link between isocyanate exposure and asthma is well established, and more is known about the pathophysiology, natural history, long term consequences, and benefits of medical surveillance in this instance than for most other occupational exposures.

A mathematical simulation model was developed based on a carefully specified set of clinical parameters, drawing from empirical studies where possible (for example, in estimating sensitisation rates ranging from 0.7% to 5.3% per year), and well qualified expert opinion otherwise (for example, in estimating the chance . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Surveillance for isocyanate asthma: a model based cost effectiveness analysis
D M Wild, C A Redlich, A D Paltiel
Occup. Environ. Med. 2005 62: 743-749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Harber, P., Levine, J., Bansal, S. (2009). How Frequently Should Workplace Spirometry Screening Be Performed?: Optimization Via Analytic Models. Chest 136: 1086-1094 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tarlo, S. M., Balmes, J., Balkissoon, R., Beach, J., Beckett, W., Bernstein, D., Blanc, P. D., Brooks, S. M., Cowl, C. T., Daroowalla, F., Harber, P., Lemiere, C., Liss, G. M., Pacheco, K. A., Redlich, C. A., Rowe, B., Heitzer, J. (2008). Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement. Chest 134: 1S-41S [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs