|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL |
| Supplement on fatigue at work |
1 Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, Academic Medical Center, AmCOGG, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Epidemiology Maastricht, University Maastricht, The Netherlands
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Fatigue is a common complaint in the working population. Approximately 20% of the working population report symptoms that fall under the concept of fatigue.1 Other surveys have reported prevalence rates of fatigue varying from 7% to 45%, depending on the instruments used and the applied cut off points.2
At first sight, the presence of fatigue in a working population does not give much reason for concern from an occupational health perspective. After work has been done, some fatigue may be expected and this fatigue is compensated for by social and financial rewards. Occupational health interest in fatigue arises from the adverse consequences that are attributed to fatigue in the more serious acute or chronic forms, and when there is insufficient opportunity to for workers to recover. Bad performance, impaired quality of services and products, and dropout of personnel may be adverse consequences. For employees, feelings
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kivimaki, P. Leino-Arjas, L. Kaila-Kangas, R. Luukkonen, J. Vahtera, M. Elovainio, M. Harma, and J. Kirjonen Is Incomplete Recovery From Work a Risk Marker of Cardiovascular Death? Prospective Evidence From Industrial Employees Psychosom Med, May 1, 2006; 68(3): 402 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |