© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group
LETTER
Respiratory effects of volcanic emissions
Dept of Epidemiology & Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK; a.hansell@imperial.ac.uk
Keywords: volcano; ash; dust; respiratory
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Although at least 455 million people worldwide live within potential exposure range of a volcano active within recorded history,1 surprisingly little primary epidemiological research on the health effects of volcanic emissions has been published. The research by Forbes and colleagues2 on the respiratory effects of the eruptions in Montserrat is therefore very welcome. However, more studies are needed to determine the transferability of results to volcanic emissions elsewhere. There may be important differences between volcanoes and between events from the same volcano in terms of eruption pattern, gaseous emissions, base composition of ash (for example, cristobalite concentrations), compounds adsorbed onto ash particles (which may be volcanic in origin or derived from other pollution sources), the percentage of particles small enough to be respirable, and toxicological activity.3 For example, most respirable ash in Montserrat has originated from pyroclastic flows, with cristobalite concentrations measured at 20.1%, but Montserrat ash derived from phreatic
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
