Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 23 January 2008. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.035147
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiemessen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frings-Dresen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiemessen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frings-Dresen, M.

Original Article

Low back pain in drivers exposed to whole body vibration: Analysis of a dose-response pattern

Ivo Tiemessen 1*, Carel Hulshof 1 and Monique Frings-Dresen 1

1 Coronel Institute for Occupational Health, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: i.j.tiemessen{at}amc.uva.nl.

Accepted 9 January 2008


*   Abstract

Objective: Analysis of a dose-response pattern between exposure to whole body vibration (WBV) and low back pain (LBP) in a group of drivers.

Methods: We assessed individual factors, work-related risk factors, various LBP outcome measures (12-month LBP, driving-related LBP, LBP intensity [Von Korff pain scale¡Y 5] and LBP disability [Roland Morris disability scale ¡Y 12]) in a group of drivers (n=571) approached at baseline (T0), as well as the WBV magnitude of a representative sample of their vehicles (n=49), at two points in time: T0 and one-year follow-up (T1). Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire and actual field measurements according to the ISO 2631-1. The magnitude and duration of vibration exposure and a variety of daily and cumulative WBV-exposure measures were calculated for each driver.

Results: A sample of 229 drivers (40.1%) completed both questionnaires (T0 and T1). The magnitude of WBV was comparable over time. Depending on the LBP outcome, various individual factors (marital status, back trauma and smoking) and work-related risk factors (previous job with heavy physical loading, lifting, bending and the physical risk index) related significantly to onset (all, p< 0.05). After adjusting for these contributing factors, we found a significant trend (an increase in odds ratios of developing LBP with an increase in WBV exposure) for driving-related LBP with daily driving time (p<0.03), and the cumulative measures total hours of exposure (p<0.01), rooth sum of squares at total dose (p<0.05) and root sum of quads at total dose (p<0.01). No significant trend was found for 12-month LBP. No analysis on a possible dose-response pattern could be derived for either LBP intensity or LBP disability, due to low prevalence.

Conclusion: We found a dose-response pattern between WBV exposure and driving-related LBP. No indication of a dose-response pattern was found between WBV exposure and 12-month LBP. Although this dose-response pattern is only an indication, these findings imply that WBV exposure might contribute to the onset of driving-related LBP.


Keywords: Dose-response pattern, Low back pain, Whole body vibration







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.