Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2007

Occup Environ Med. Published Online First: 4 April 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.029678
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
oem.2006.029678v1
64/12/792    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, A. G.E.M.
Right arrow Articles by Frings-Dresen, M. H.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, A. G.E.M.
Right arrow Articles by Frings-Dresen, M. H.W.

Original Article

The effect of individual counselling and education on work ability and disability pension: a prospective intervention study in the construction industry

Angela G.E.M. de Boer 1*, Alex Burdorf 2, Cor van Duivenbooden 3 and Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen 1

1 Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands
2 Department of Public Health, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Netherlands
3 Arbouw Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.g.deboer{at}amc.uva.nl.

Accepted 9 February 2007


*   Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of a counselling and education programme on work ability and work disability pension for employees in the construction industry. Methods: Employees with a high disability risk of 38% or higher in the next four years were included. Employees in the intervention group were either selected by an occupational physician or enrolled themselves. They received an assessment and individual programme focused on optimizing work functioning, while the control group received care-as-usual. Data on work ability measured with the work ability index (WAI) and work disability pensions were collected at baseline during a periodic occupational health examination and at 9 months, 18 months and 26 months after the start of the intervention with a questionnaire. Results: Most employees in both intervention (n=83) and control group (n=209) were carpenters (43% and 37%) and bricklayers (7% and 15%). A successful completion of the programme was achieved by 42% of the participants in the intervention group. Work ability in the intervention group was lower at baseline but showed an increase over time while work ability of the control group remained the same. The work ability in the intervention group improved slightly more (p=0.09). No statistically significant differences in percentages of employees receiving a disability pension between the intervention and control group were found at 9 or 18 months and no differences in the age-adjusted percentages of employees receiving a disability pension were found between the groups at any measurement. Conclusions: The programme was slightly effective in improving the work ability but not in reducing work disability pensions. A more comprehensive multi-disciplinary intervention programme might be necessary.


Keywords: construction indusrty, construction worker, disability pension, early retirement, work ability







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.