HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: oem.2007.033381v1 65/6/398    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Miller, B G Articles by Soutar, C A PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, B G Articles by Soutar, C A

A normative study of levels of uranium in the urine of British Forces personnel

¹ Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
² Institute of Naval Medicine, Gosport, Hampshire, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Brian G Miller, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, Scotland, UK; brian.miller{at}iom-world.org

Objectives: The UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) controls a biological monitoring programme that includes testing for uranium in personnel who served in the conflict in Iraq in 2003. To help interpret the results, the MoD commissioned this study to quantify a normative reference distribution of urinary uranium concentrations in military personnel who had not served in that conflict.

Methods: The study selected and visited various military establishments to recruit a representative mix of ranks, genders and occupational groups (combat, support and auxiliary). A standardised protocol and recruitment questionnaire were used. The 125 ml spot urine samples collected were analysed for uranium and creatinine concentrations and (where possible) for uranium isotope ²³⁸U/²³⁵U ratio.

Results: Samples from 732 eligible subjects were analysed. Adjusted uranium concentrations ranged up to 556 ng.g^–1 creatinine, somewhat higher than reference values quoted for the USA but much lower than recorded in granite areas such as Finland. Isotope ratio measurements were available for 125 samples (17%) with the highest concentrations; these all had a natural isotope signature and no evidence of depleted uranium (DU). On average, urinary uranium concentrations were somewhat lower in officers than in other ranks; they differed also across the services, the Navy being lowest and the Army highest. The levels give no concern regarding health risks in the personnel studied.

Conclusion: Since even the highest values were from natural sources, we assume the differences represent differences in ingestion of natural uranium. Definition of a reference distribution or normal values will depend on the subpopulation of interest.