|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
1 Institute of Management Science, Division Ergonomics and Organization, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
2 Division of Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
3 Empirical Research & Statistical Consulting, Vienna, Austria
4 Fraunhofer Project Group for Production- and Logistics Management in Vienna (Fraunhofer PPL), Vienna, Austria
5 Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
6 Atomic Institute of the Austrian Universities, Vienna, Austria
Correspondence to:
Dr A Barth, Institute of Management Science, Division Ergonomics and Organization, Vienna University of Technology, Theresianumgasse 27, A-1040 Vienna, Austria; barth{at}imw.tuwien.ac.at
Background and objective: Numerous studies have investigated the potential effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by GSM mobile phones (
900 MHz to
1800 MHz) on cognitive functioning, but results have been equivocal. In order to try and clarify this issue, the current study carried out a meta-analysis on 19 experimental studies.
Design: Meta-analysis.
Methods: Nineteen studies were taken into consideration. Ten of them were included in the meta-analysis as they fulfilled several minimum requirements; for example, single-blind or double-blind experimental study design and documentation of means and standard deviation of the dependent variables. The meta-analysis compared exposed with non-exposed subjects assuming that there is a common population effect so that one single effect size could be calculated. When homogeneity for single effect sizes was not given, an own population effect for each study and a distribution of population effects was assumed.
Results: Attention measured by the subtraction task seems to be affected in regard to decreased reaction time. Working memory measured by the N-back test seems to be affected too: under condition 0-back target response time is lower under exposure, while under condition 2-back target response time increases. The number of errors under condition 2-back non-targets appears to be higher under exposure.
Conclusion: Results of the meta-analysis suggest that EMFs may have a small impact on human attention and working memory.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Palmer Work in Brief Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2008; 65(5): 297 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |