HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correction (v65,p576) All Versions of this Article: oem.2007.035378v1 65/5/331    most recent Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Palmer, K T Articles by Coggon, D PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Palmer, K T Articles by Coggon, D Topic Collections Relevant Article

How common is repetitive strain injury?

¹ MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
² MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor K Palmer, MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; ktp{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk

Objective: Statistics from Labour Force Surveys are widely quoted as evidence for the scale of occupational illness in Europe. However, occupational attribution depends on whether participants believe their health problem is caused or aggravated by work, and personal beliefs may be unreliable. The authors assessed the potential for error for work-associated arm pain.

Methods: A questionnaire was emailed to working-aged adults, randomly chosen from five British general practices. They were asked about: occupational activities; mental health; self-rated health; arm pain; and beliefs about its causation. Those in work (n = 1769) were asked about activities likely to cause arm pain, from which the authors derived a variable for exposure to any "arm-straining" occupational activity. The authors estimated the relative risk (RR) from arm-straining activity, using a modified Cox model, and derived the population attributable fraction (PAF). They compared the proportion of arm pain cases reporting their symptom as caused or made worse by work with the calculated PAF, overall and for subsets defined by demographic and other characteristics.

Results: Arm pain in the past year was more common in the 1143 subjects who reported exposure to arm-straining occupational activity (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5). In the study sample as a whole, 53.9% of 817 cases reported their arm pain as work-associated, whereas the PAF for arm-straining occupational activity was only 13.9%. The ratio of cases reported as work-related to the calculated attributable number was substantially higher below 50 years (5.4) than at older ages (3.0) and higher in those with worse self-rated and mental health.

Conclusions: Counting people with arm pain which they believe to be work-related can overestimate the number of cases attributable to work substantially. This casts doubt on the validity of a major source of information used by European governments to evaluate their occupational health strategies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Palmer Work in Brief Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2008; 65(5): 297 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: