Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 11 July 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.032243
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2008;65:311-318
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A randomised controlled trial evaluating an alternative mouse and forearm support on upper body discomfort and musculoskeletal disorders among engineers

C F Conlon1, N Krause2, D M Rempel2

1 School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
2 Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA

Dr D Rempel, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1301 South 46th Street, Building 163, Richmond, CA 94804, USA; david.rempel{at}ucsf.edu

Objectives: The aim of this intervention study was to determine the effects of an alternative mouse and/or a forearm support board on the change in upper body discomfort scores and the development of incident musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods: This randomised controlled intervention trial followed 206 engineers for one year. Participants were randomised to receive (1) a conventional mouse only, (2) an alternative mouse only, (3) a forearm support board, or (4) an alternative mouse plus forearm support board. Outcome measures included weekly upper body discomfort scores and incident musculoskeletal disorders.

Results: During the study, 42 participants were diagnosed with an incident musculoskeletal disorder. The group that received the forearm support board experienced a reduction in their right upper extremity discomfort (beta-coefficient –0.35, 95% CI –0.67 to –0.03) in comparison to those who did not receive a forearm board. The group that received the alternative mouse had a protective, but non-significant (p = 0.20), effect on incident cases of right upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.34) and a non-significant reduction in neck/shoulder discomfort (beta-coefficient –0.23, 95% CI –0.056 to 0.10) in comparison to those who received a conventional mouse.

Conclusions: In engineers who use a computer for more than 20 h per week, a forearm support board may reduce right upper extremity discomfort attributed to computer use.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Growing knowledge about "what works" to prevent work injuries
Benjamin C Amick
Occup. Environ. Med. 2008 65: 297-298. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Amick, B. C (2008). Growing knowledge about "what works" to prevent work injuries. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 297-298 [Full Text]  
  • Palmer, K. (2008). Work in Brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 297-297 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs