Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 10 October 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.036095
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2008;65:268-274
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
oem.2007.036095v1
65/4/268    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plouvier, S
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plouvier, S
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, A

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Biomechanical strains and low back disorders: quantifying the effects of the number of years of exposure on various types of pain

S Plouvier1,2, E Renahy3,4, J F Chastang1,2, S Bonenfant5, A Leclerc1,2

1 INSERM, U687, Saint-Maurice, France
2 IFR69, Villejuif, France
3 INSERM, UMR S 707, Paris, France
4 Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR S 707, Paris, France
5 CETAF-RPPC, INSERM U687, Saint-Maurice, France

Correspondence to:
Dr S Plouvier INSERM, U 687 Hopital National Saint Maurice, 14 rue de val d’Osne, 94410 Saint-Maurice, France; plouvier{at}st-maurice.inserm.fr

Objective: To assess the effects of duration of exposure to biomechanical strains on various types of low back pain (LBP).

Methods: The population study was a random sample from the GAZEL cohort. Durations of exposure to selected biomechanical strains during subjects’ working lifetime and potential confounders were assessed in 1996 by self-administered questionnaires. Data on LBP in the previous 12 months were collected in 2001. Relations between various dimensions of LBP and durations of exposure to the biomechanical strains were analysed with multivariate regression models. Polytomous models were built to determine whether some biomechanical strains were specifically associated with some types of LBP.

Results: Analyses were performed separately for men (n = 2218) and women (n = 383). Significant associations were observed (ORs reported are those for 20 years of exposure) between LBP and durations of driving and bending/twisting for men (OR 1.24 and 1.37 respectively); LBP for more than 30 days and duration of exposure to bending/twisting for men and women (OR 2.20 and 2.00 respectively) and duration of driving for women (OR 3.15); LBP radiating to the leg and duration of driving for men (OR 1.43) and bending/twisting for women (OR 1.95); LBP radiating below the knee and duration of exposure to pulling/pushing/carrying for men (OR 1.88). Bending/twisting in both men and women, and driving for women appeared to be stronger risk factors for LBP for more than 30 days. Pulling/pushing/carrying heavy loads appeared to be a risk factor specific for LBP radiating below the knee for men.

Conclusion: This study suggests that exposure to biomechanical strains has long-term effects and a dose-response relation with duration of exposure and specific effects for some types of LBP.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.